![]() (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. The deadline for the Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is June 30, 2023. Text Order GRANTING #18 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Jason K. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Shannon Hardy, #2 Declaration of Christopher Kao, #3 Exhibit 1 to C. MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue, or in the Alternative, to Transfer to the Northern District of California, or Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by LinkedIn Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Warren, Sanford) MOTION to Strike #19 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue, or in the Alternative, to Transfer to the Northern District of California, or Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Adnexus Incorporated, LLC. Kao, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Proposed Order)(Kao, Christopher) Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by LinkedIn Corporation, re #20 MOTION to Strike #19 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue, or in the Alternative, to Transfer to the Northern District of California, or Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Plaintiff Adnexus Incorporated, LLC (Attachments: #1 Declaration of C. REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Adnexus Incorporated, LLC, re #20 MOTION to Strike #19 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue, or in the Alternative, to Transfer to the Northern District of California, or Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Plaintiff Adnexus Incorporated, LLC (Warren, Sanford) Texas by LinkedIn Corporation (Weber, Brock) Zito added to party Adnexus Incorporated, LLC(pty:pla) (Zito, Joseph) Zito on behalf of Adnexus Incorporated, LLC. ![]() NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joseph J. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court grants the first motion and thus TRANSFERS the case to the Northern District of California. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on )Ĭase transferred in from District of Texas Western Case Number 6:23-cv-00151. Initial Case Management Conference set for 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor. Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by. There is no document associated with this entry.) (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on ) ![]() Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. (Kao, Christopher) (Filed on ) Modified on (anj, COURT STAFF).ĬLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by. STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint re #17 Amended Complaint filed by LinkedIn Corporation and Adnexus Incorporated, LLC. (Kao, Christopher) (Filed on )ĬONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by LinkedIn Corporation. (Kao, Christopher) (Filed on ) Modified on (cjl, COURT STAFF).ĪNSWER to Amended Complaint by LinkedIn Corporation. 3-15 AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT UNDER FRCP 7.1 by LinkedIn Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Microsoft Corporation for LinkedIn Corporation. A more recent docket listingĬERTIFICATION OF CONFLICTS AND INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS PURSUANT TO L.R. ![]() Please place the order on the website to order your own originally done case solution.This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2023. This is just a sample partial case solution. Total Working Minutes (Assumed) 600 minutes The recommended number of the TCs required in order to maintain a consistent level of service in each of the three areas are as follows: The average service time is 5 minutes so the total time spent on providing the service to a single customer is 6 minutes and the average time span is 30 minutes or half hour.īased upon this information, the average calls on hold in a 30 minute time span has been computed and then based upon the total calls on hold the number of the TCs has also been computed by dividing the total calls on hold by 6 since, 6 customers could be served in a half hour time span on average. The call volume is managed by the BTCs if the average waiting time is 60 seconds. Therefore, if there is enough number of the counselors in such situations in order to manage the peal call volumes then a consistent and a good quality service could be provided to the customers. However, the random arrivals in the business are not at all deterministic. Yes, the BTCs are responding to the random arrivals in the business. Do the BTC’s respond to random arrivals? If so, how can we provide good, consistent service to our customer in such an environment? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |